In a significant twist to the ongoing Janwada farmhouse party case, new revelations have emerged regarding key evidence. A woman has come forward claiming that Vijay Madduri handed over her phone to the police instead of his own during the initial raid, adding a new layer of complexity to the investigation.
The Telangana High Court has given Raj Pakala 48 hours to respond to the case. Meanwhile, police investigations continue into the details of the night party, with authorities now examining why Vijay Madduri’s phone has remained switched off since yesterday.
The case took another turn when the High Court heard a lunch motion petition on Monday. The Additional Advocate General (AAG) informed the court that they have substantial evidence and statements to proceed with the investigation. However, Raj Pakala’s legal team strongly contested this, arguing that the case represents political harassment and that the raids on a private party were conducted with malicious intent. The defense raised serious concerns about both the FIR and what they described as a rushed investigation process.
Police are actively investigating the events of the night party and are now preparing to record a statement from the woman who has claimed ownership of the phone in question. This development has opened new lines of inquiry in the investigation, as authorities work to verify the authenticity of all evidence collected during the raid.
The spotlight now rests on how Vijay Madduri and Raj Pakala will respond to authorities after the 48-hour deadline set by the High Court expires. Their responses could significantly influence the direction of this high-profile case that continues to draw attention across Telangana’s political landscape.
The woman seeking her phone’s return, has approached Mokila police station, requesting the return of her device. Police officials have indicated they will be recording her statement as part of the ongoing investigation.
-Sanyogita
