I am audacious enough to question anyone!, should someone have to direct me?, I’m not here to blow the trumpet of any leader, – goes Jana Sena founder Pawan Kalyan’s speech during public meetings.
But TDP supremo and AP CM Chandrababu Naidu has altogether a different script while addressing newsmen – “I lived life like a fire, I would never compromise or fear for anybody, for whom should I be scared of? and for what should I be frightened for?…. and so on.
However much he may wish to say so, it is an open secret that Chandrababu Naidu has some fear for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao as the former is embroiled in the infamous case of ‘cash-for-vote’ scandal.
General public has a different opinion on YSRCP chief YS Jaganmohan Reddy. Other than Naidu, no leader comes to his sight if Jagan has to make criticism. Perhaps, Jagan might be fearful of other leaders. But coming to Jana Sena leader Pawan Kalyan, he made a strategic attack on Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu by not taking the names of Modi and Chandrababu Naidu.
Pawan, who took time to praise himself saying he read several books voraciously, did not make a single comment on Modi during Kakinada meeting. Though Modi had reiterated many times that the Centre was committed to give special status to Andhra Pradesh, Pawan did not dare to comment on Modi in the public meeting. Now the issue is making the political pundits to think out of box. There were several questions being raised over the Pawan’s strategic attack on leaders. Is Pawan paving his way into politics in the future?
Why the Jana Sena founder, who claimed that he doesn’t have thirst for money or power, hesitated to criticise Narendra Modi while equally taking pot shots at M Venkaiah Naidu? Why Pawan Kalyan, who lashed at the Ministers and the TDP MPs, made no remark against Naidu? It is absurd if we think that Pawan doesn’t know the fact that these Ministers, working under the Chief Minister, had habituated to lead a lifestyle similar to slavery a few decades ago itself.
Pawan might have larger interests, deals or say commitments behind not commenting on Modi and Naidu. If he is so audacious enough why he is targeting chieftains sparing the rulers?
