The Tirupati laddu incident has sparked a debate about openness in religious practices. Some say talking about temple problems hurts believers. Others think it’s good to point out issues.

Some people who call themselves “intellectual secularists” worry this will cause religious tensions. But are they really being fair?

The main problem is about how the famous temple laddu Prasadam is handled. Critics say this was disrespectful. They think hiding problems is worse than talking about them.

People who want honesty compare it to checking restaurants for safety. If a restaurant has bad food, that’s enough to take action. It’s the same with temples.

This shows a clash between old ways and being responsible. Some worry openness will harm faith. Others say it makes religious places stronger.

The argument is also about secularism in India. Some people say fake secularists only want openness when it helps them politically.

A big part of this debate was about “Sanatan Dharma.” This excited some people on social media, including celebrities looking for attention. It’s sad because Hinduism isn’t tied to any political party. But some so-called smart people won’t admit this. They try to spread new ideas by making fun of old ones.

-Sanyogita